This proposal does these things:
| The tag names are structure and delimiters from existing specification. | |
| Every record, field, and subfield has a direct representation. | |
| The order of records and elements exactly matches the existing specification. |
| PRO's | CON's |
| Easy to conceptually understand and map XML elements to ITL-2000 elements (forward translation, and reverse translation). | Complex data relationships that can be expressed in XML are not so expressed. |
| Easy for existing implementations to migrate from ITL-2000 to XML (minimizing reprogramming effort). | Elements are represented as a "row," not a "tree." |
| Does not abandon the proven ANSI/NIST-ITL standard that has been operational for many years. | Does not adopt new biometric models defined by CBEFF or GJXDM. |
| GJXDM can be included as "user data" -- especially the content of the Type-2, User-defined Descriptive Text record. | Tag names are undescriptive of content, do not conform to ISO-11179. |
| CBEFF can be included as an additional record type. | |
| All rules and data definition for elements exactly conform to the ITL-2000 specification. | |
| Of the four options, will create the "smallest" instance records. | |
Two similar proposals:
|
<record type="2"> <field number="2" name="T2_IDC"> <subfield> <item>00</item> </subfield> </field> <field number="5" name="T2_RET"> <subfield> <item>Y</item> </subfield> </field> <field number="6" name="T2_ATN"> <subfield> <item>SA J Q SMITH, RM 4569</item> </subfield> </field> </record> <Type2> <T2_IDC> <subfield> <item>00</item> </subfield> </T2_IDC> <T2_RET> <subfield> <item>Y</item> </subfield> </T2_RET> <T2_ATN> <subfield> <item>SA J Q SMITH, RM 4569</item> </subfield> </T2_ATN> .. </Type2>
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <itl version="ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2000"> <record type="1"> <field nr="3" name="CNT"> <rs> <us>1</us> <us>1</us> </rs> <rs> <us>2</us> <us>0</us> </rs> </field></record> <record type="2"> <field nr="18" name="NAM"> DOE,JANE </field></record> <record type="4"> <field nr="1” name="LEN">12786</field> <field nr="9” name="IMG" ” format="base64" > /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/4RF4R … </field></record> </itl> |